When a person is in love, she could keep her hand in ice
water until it is frost bitten; lift a car off a toddler – not even her
toddler; eat 50 hotdogs in under 30 minutes; give mouth-to-mouth resuscitation to
an anteater; walk across burning coals; run across the Mohave Desert in a wool
coat and so on like that.
Corporations should hire only people in love, fire them when
they are no longer in love and replace them with other people who are in love.
If everybody who worked for a company was in love, the company could get away
with sexual harassment, pay people far less than they are worth, and repeatedly
ask them to do things near the limit of their capacity. Not that we want our
companies to do those things, but they could, if everyone was in love- and no
one would hardly notice.
If everyone on the planet was in love, global climate change
could be soon solved. Those who lived in cold climates would never complain
about the cold, they would just cuddle up with the one they loved, without
needing to produce greenhouse gases to stay warm through energy use. Those who
lived in warm climates would never complain about the warmth and not care about
air conditioning, because they would want to spend all their time looking at the
body of the one they love in its relative state of nakedness.
Of course, if we were all to stay in love, we might have to
give up one of our long-standing traditions – monogamy. It is not easy staying
head-over-heels in love with the same person for more than a few months or
years. So, for everyone to maximize the amount of deep love they feel over the
course of their lifetime, we would likely need to be polyamorists.
You may think it a strange thing for a marriage and family
therapist to be advocating polyamory, but let me explain. Sure, it would be devastating
to our families, our children, even our economy, for everyone to shift
immediately away from monogamy. However, what if all of us were constantly
seeking to improve ourselves, to the extent that every few years the people who
knew us before could not recognize the new us. This could mean those who loved
us before might be able to fall in love with the new us, especially if they too
were evolving and becoming new people.
What sort of “new people” should we seek to become? We
should seek to become the person we fantasize about being, the person we find
most admirable, most attractive. We could constantly roll out the new us,
excited and refreshed, ready for the person who once loved the old us to find
the new us, and fall in love with us once more.
As long as we are all moving ahead with our lives, finding
excitement in now, in tomorrow and at future prospects; the odds of the person
with whom we are in love falling out of love with us, would go down
dramatically, I would suspect. Science could be done to either bear me out on
this, or not.
The more we all stay alive and fresh to what life has to
offer, the more likely it is the person with whom we are in love, will stay in
love with us and we with them; without having to become polyamorous – in anything
other than the new way I am proposing here- or otherwise jeopardizing the
social order that makes traditional families possible.
I know, you hear it all the time, that being in love is
always temporary and you should not look for love to sustain your marriage but
rather you should look for something like compassion or commitment or some
other word beginning with C. I say, that may be, but since we all know love has
a singularly strong-positive effect on human beings. Why not figure out a way
to stay under its influence for as much of our lives as we can?
In some ways, I think we are given this proposition by life:
if you want to increase the likelihood of staying in love, sign a mutual change
pact between yourself and the one with whom you are in love.
No comments:
Post a Comment